Modify your diet and don’t take statins. Don’t let your doctor shame you into taking it. I stopped taking it and told my doctor I wouldn’t take it anymore. Just one year taking it, I found an article about what it does to the brain. Saved my sanity and made my decision not to take it unshakeable.
sorry I commented too early before I read the article fully - its pretty damning and no surprise they would do such a thing - does this mean you couldn't recover function if you stopped taking statins?
iliyana is a mixed bag of true unique revelations and angles others miss and flat out wrong or intentional misinformation..What drives this bag of chaos I'm not sure but I do utilize her good stuff as is unique..certainly she should be citing sources for mrna in other drugs or stains asap as we as readers should try to verify ie Yandex.com : mRNA in statin drugs..just do it ..report back here gang..this info release may be true as they're putting graphene in many drugs and mRNA ties almost inherent now..iliyana,my dear trusted source I mean ,..ahem..can you please expand on mRNA, graphene inherent drug ties theory and evidences ie patents notes citing proofs to take this above just trust Iliana and schedule appt $$ for rest of story..yikes!
I think all drugs fall into the category of "sorceries" as the Bible says. They are meant to keep us perpetually sick and making the medical practitioners rich by testings, Rx kickbacks, and getting new customers for life hooked into their webs of deceit. At least now, since Rome owns most hospitals, medical testing labs, universities, and most of the world, they are bent on genocide, not health. Rome serves the devil, not God. I have read reports of their plans to destroy humanity by drugs and vexines, especially spiritually. You can research it all, but especially on darknessisfalling dot com. It's hard to believe, but true. Just about everything is genetically modified now, including the staples God provided us with. Wheat, corn, grains, etc. You can find it all on the above website. All truth. All researched thoroughly...and proving the Bible to be 100% true and being fulfilled just as it says.
Book of Enoch fallen angel/ hybrid giants root magic lore suggest an attempt to combine their energys with roots and plants..mandrake most famously..but many ie possessed plants ingested compromising our spiritual integrity..also alluded too in witch's brews etc.
Potentcizing these further in isolations,increasing toxicitys and nature's abilities to temper and soften such evils has led to part of the toxic problem with modern drugs...minions aware of this and further effecting it at DNA or nano vibe level further still down the bad hole..many drugs laced with snake venom tied to the Garden situation..so yes much bad of it..but some good of healing Godly herbs..discerning of tampered with by evil part of mission of Christians,etc
It seems yes, you can do it, but it probably depends on the delivery method. Proteins like the one mentioned can cleave and modify gene expression Pills are unlikely but not impossible - intravenous is a yes, other methods seem to be at experimental stages but given they lie about everything who knows?
Timed release pills can likely release lower intestines,etc, nasal definitely,proven nasal delivery, skin by micro needles..which proves patches can to likely as well as creams,gels with solvent ir DMSO...All this DMSO push makes me nervous or how can it not physlitate spread of nano,mRNA, parasites etc yet so little talk of that= scary suspicious..beware of DMSO my new current peeve.
Because dmso admittedly assists as a solvent,likely the most powerful bio solvent allowing protective barriers, membranes,etc to be crossed by not just dmso but all chemicals and items in the vicinity of the DMSO including nano tech or par asites..
Hulda Clark however the queen of anti parasite cures and devices thought DMSO somehow was ok and curative reaching deep into the foul, rancid oils and fats where parasites hide as well as heavy metals and toxic chemicals... isopropyl alcohol and another alcohol I forget she labeled a toxic solvent permitting parasites to get thru..my guess is the rubbing alcohol is destroying the tissue as well and parasites love dead tissue whereas dmso doesn't...still I'm not certain that since parasites couldn't utilize the dmso to slip thru especially the artificial partly at least programmed parasites that tend to utilize proteins from real parasites..why ivermectin can stop both nano and parasites.
Dmso vs nano= largely unknown to my knowledge..and several kinds of nano..don't like that risky mystery..tests must be done as nano is more dangerous then parasites or fast mind control, other..
Iliyans specialized in revealing hi tech in drugs far from what's supposed to be there..I wouldn't bet the farm she's not right..but the evidence isnt concise nor seconded by others..
In a nutshell why do stations end up killing mitochondrial..ties to neuronal deficit then as well since gut bio factors are producing neurons? Is this compounded by more simplistic lack of cholesterol,fats statins targeting for such as brain feeds on cholesterol to function better?
Statins are extremely bad for people but that doesn’t mean that it employs CRISPR technology. If someone gets off statins the suppression of LDL production stops. If it was causing a gene edit (as does CRISPR) the effect would be permanent.
Cholesterol does not predict degree of atherosclerosis at autopsy
In 1936, Landé and Sperry noted that the degree of aortic atherosclerosis at autopsy of healthy individuals who had died violently, was independent on their blood cholesterol concentration analysed immediately after death.4 Their finding was confirmed by Mathur et al.5 and similar results were obtained by others.6–8 The objection that an analysis of cholesterol after death may not reflect its concentration during life was met by Mathur et al.5 who found that the cholesterol concentration was almost constant up to 16 h after death. Paterson et al.6 bypassed the problem by comparing the degree of atherosclerosis at death with the individuals’ cholesterol measured previously on several occasions. In all these studies, plots of blood cholesterol concentrations vs. the lipid content of the aorta or the coronary arteries were widely scattered.
More recent autopsy studies have found weak or inconsistent correlations between LDL‐cholesterol or total cholesterol and various measures of atherosclerosis.9 For instance, the most severe degree of atherosclerosis was found mainly in individuals with extremely high cholesterol, whereas small differences were seen in the rest.10 A correlation was found in White men, but not in Black men,11 in men but not in women,12 in individuals below, but not above age 80 years,13 and in the coronary arteries, but not in the thoracic or abdominal aorta.14
The weak and unpredictable correlations probably reflect bias, because most of the studies were performed on selected individuals. In such large projects, the main object of which was to study risk factors for cardiovascular disease, individuals with such diseases, or with high cholesterol, were preferred for post‐mortem examination,10–15 which means that the proportion of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia must have been much larger than in the general population. As such patients have very high cholesterol and are more prone to vascular changes, their inclusion automatically creates a correlation between degree of atherosclerosis and LDL or total cholesterol. Accordingly, it is obvious from a figure in a preliminary report that the correlation disappears if individuals with total cholesterol >350 mg/ml (9 mmol/l) are excluded.16 It is questionable if the vascular changes seen in familial hypercholesterolaemia are synonymous with atherosclerosis.17,18 Therefore, to prove that the concentration of LDL‐cholesterol has importance in the general population, it is necessary to exclude individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Cholesterol does not correlate with degree of coronary atherosclerosis on angiography
A correlation between the pathological findings seen on coronary angiography and cholesterol has been found in many studies.19 However, the correlation coefficients in these studies were never >0.36 and often much smaller; in some studies no correlation was found.20–23 When present, the correlation found may have been due to bias by the process mentioned above, because coronary angiography is mainly performed on patients with symptomatic coronary disease, and more often on middle‐aged and younger patients. The correlation disappeared in one study after exclusion of patients treated with lipid‐lowering drugs.24
Cholesterol does not correlate with degree of coronary calcification
In contrast to conventional angiography, electron beam angiography detects coronary plaques independent of their location in the vessel wall, but only calcified plaques. Degree of coronary calcification seems a good surrogate for degree of coronary atherosclerosis, because it correlates strongly with total plaque volume and obstructive coronary disease, and is a powerful predictor of clinical outcome. Nonetheless, degree of coronary calcification did not correlate with any lipid fraction in the blood.25
Cholesterol does not correlate with degree of peripheral atherosclerosis
Many studies have found an association between LDL‐ or total cholesterol and peripheral atherosclerosis, depicted by angiography or ultrasonography, but only in dichotomous analyses, and again, differences have been found mainly between individuals with very high cholesterol concentrations and the rest. In ultrasonographic studies, where degree of carotic atherosclerosis was graded as a continuous variable, no correlation was found with individual LDL‐cholesterol concentrations.26,27 In similar studies using aortic28 and femoral29 angiography, no correlation was found either. Mean femoral intima‐media thickness was evaluated by ultrasonography in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and in control individuals with normal cholesterol. Using all observations, a correlation was found (r=0.41), but from a visual judgement of the scatterplot, within each group no clear correlation was present.30
Looking at photos of calcified arteries seems clear calcification is occurring first by damaging inner vein sides and penetrating ,causing dryness and brittleness and occasional ruptured..cholesterol also functions as main vein patch kit when this occurs,why plaqued photos reveal a thin white ish color on veins edge,then a layer of yellowish, lite brownish plaque that's obviously primarily cholesterol.
Occasionally you'll find photos of arteries with solid shiny white chalk and no yellow etc at all= pure calcification caused likely by excess calcium and vitamin D supplements as only that combo could force white chalk calcium into veins to shiny,reflective level.
7 years ago over a quarter of photos shown under Google search of calcified arteries showed white calcified chalk effect,virtually no level or less then 5 to 10 percent anyways.
Today you google and virtually no white coated arteries pop up= conspiracy to delete proofs that it's calcification ,not cholesterol as primary instigator and cause as well as heart disease and artery,vein disease and many European researchers claim dementia and Alzheimer's as well(brain is more sensitive to other toxic metals ie aluminum,etc but binding effect of calcium to heavy metals is purposely ignored by elite conspirators who run big pharma).
Without cholesterol repairing vein damages like glue of sharp edges synthetic calcium from China largely,death would be sooner not later avg.
Vitamin D ,choliciferol is active ingredient of many rat poisons that work by hormone signaling yanking of calcium from rats bones at extreme dose into arteries, caking them and organs and rat dies of dehydration by preliminary stages of calcification...if that rat lived a few more weeks or months that caking, dehydration stage would reach brittleness of veins linings and ruptured would occur in heart attack, stroke,clots forming at damage site and dislodging, travelinh to heart or brain or even internally bleeding to death from vein ruptured..
At lower dose takes usually years for this to occur with humans..but inner dehydration ie arteries not flexible and watered enough also plays into all this: best to over hydrate with a pinch of sea salt and lemon juice fresh added (about a half squeezed lemon per liter or 2)..
Vit.D assists health as a lab synthetic by sucking not just calcium but all minerals from bones fast (ie most first 2 hours after taking pills) causing a energy and co factor nutrient rush as well as pulling in sun activated cholesterol sulfate from skin(ie sulfur=pullable by D mineral you see..) but primary effect is from bones mineral pull contrary to what we've been told or how can you pull calcium from bones and not other minerals, duh ,we've been so gullible.. elites realized feeding their little workers cardboard, synthetic foods would not sustain on minerals anyway so they devised a clever solution to rob the bones daily of bioavailable top level minerals in small amounts to keep blood then body healthier with the cost not generally seem got most people until mid 60s with crippling osteoporosis and mass bone breaks ie hip fractures accounting for a quarter of eventual deaths nearly.. perfect! They don't want or need us past 60 now or push for elderly to suicide themselves or allow hospitals to do it..
See how that all comes together fellow rats,oh sorry humans I meant!?
Yes indeed.Maybe I'll use way back machine to fetch old white chalky hundred percent calcified arteries used to be widely shown on google..But really likely over half heart surgeons would confess calcification of arteries primary issues not plaque largely cholesterol caused or instigated anyway and current accepted line that calcification percentage is actually helpful to prevent soft plaque break offs ie clotting is a misleading lie largely to detour from calcium buildup as main villain..Only question is how much of a factor is synthetic ,china made largely rough edged calcium flakes embedding like asbestos in vein linings vs calcium in smoother, bio available form from bone releases (caused by vit.D ,other) a percentage factor in modern heart disease).Judging by many factors including radical reductions of calcium supplement milligram averages in multi vitamins,maybe a quarter multis down to zero,mirroring nearly what happened with iron reductions over a decade back,it may one day be realized that synthetic calcium was in competition with Vitamin D ( rat poison,avg rat dead 5 days,with synthetic calcium added formula for extra $2 rats dead in 2.5 days avg )as most killer eventually substances in modern man's regular food diet or even drug category as well! I'm guessing over fifty percent of West's populace mildly to seriously diseased by age fifty by these 2 so called vitamins..would make it a top 10 cause of disease and death,pre reductions of D and calcium levels ie 6 to 20 years back top 5 reducer of population post 50 years of age,pre 50 years still top 15-20...has to be since heart and vein disease is tied approx with cancer as number one killer and white chalky calcium deposits are found in 96 percent of breast cancers with high levels also of toxic metals binding and about a quarter of other tumours across body.Calcium deposits many other diseases measure role,not so third world countrys unfortified or supplemented=rat poison ie Vit.D and synthetic calcium our most effective poison of billions of rats and unfortunately billions of humans too!
I blame my mother’s dementia on her 20 year use of statin meds. As she got older and her memory started to fail, and I had POA for her healthcare, I would ask her PCP about the statins and memory loss. His reply…”oh she’s on a low dose statin”. I finally got him to take her off the statins (after talking to him about them and her memory for over two years). This was 9 months prior to her death. But it was too late, as far as her memory…the damage had been done. And I didn’t allow her to get the C*V*D Jabs either!
Unfortunately, most people are so conditioned to trust standard medical information, they don’t want to listen to anything contrary, even when it might be in their own interest.
Death and destruction all around, and the depths of the wickedness hard to plumb.
Hi Carol! I wonder if you have ever done the research on the supplements and how its nano technology interacts with liver and gull bladder? As I understand most of the waste detoxed by liver system, will the gull bladder stone associated with the nano technology in the supplement? Thanks
Iv’e been telling folks to get off this poison FOR YEARS. When I was a pharmacy tech we had recalls on this all the time.
High cholesterol is another BS dx to sell more drugs
God bless you for your research. How can we know what we are not told for informed consent?
Modify your diet and don’t take statins. Don’t let your doctor shame you into taking it. I stopped taking it and told my doctor I wouldn’t take it anymore. Just one year taking it, I found an article about what it does to the brain. Saved my sanity and made my decision not to take it unshakeable.
Did you have any muscle pain, muscle weakness or trouble walking while taking the statins? And when you stopped taking them did you feel better?
No.
Is the ‘no’ to the first question? And when you quit taking them did you notice if you felt different?
No change. Just happy I stopped. The research I read made my head blow up.
Why fool with pharma drugs at all when WFPB diet is good for the body?
The comment about statins being a mRNA gene deleting crispr kit seems inaccurate are you talking about a new class of statin?
I brought the receipts. If you don’t click on the links and view the evidence for yourself then nobody can help you.
ALL Statin drugs are gene therapy.
sorry I commented too early before I read the article fully - its pretty damning and no surprise they would do such a thing - does this mean you couldn't recover function if you stopped taking statins?
iliyana is a mixed bag of true unique revelations and angles others miss and flat out wrong or intentional misinformation..What drives this bag of chaos I'm not sure but I do utilize her good stuff as is unique..certainly she should be citing sources for mrna in other drugs or stains asap as we as readers should try to verify ie Yandex.com : mRNA in statin drugs..just do it ..report back here gang..this info release may be true as they're putting graphene in many drugs and mRNA ties almost inherent now..iliyana,my dear trusted source I mean ,..ahem..can you please expand on mRNA, graphene inherent drug ties theory and evidences ie patents notes citing proofs to take this above just trust Iliana and schedule appt $$ for rest of story..yikes!
Is she suggesting mRNA gene editing is being added to many drugs since 2020..? Which other drugs?
I think all drugs fall into the category of "sorceries" as the Bible says. They are meant to keep us perpetually sick and making the medical practitioners rich by testings, Rx kickbacks, and getting new customers for life hooked into their webs of deceit. At least now, since Rome owns most hospitals, medical testing labs, universities, and most of the world, they are bent on genocide, not health. Rome serves the devil, not God. I have read reports of their plans to destroy humanity by drugs and vexines, especially spiritually. You can research it all, but especially on darknessisfalling dot com. It's hard to believe, but true. Just about everything is genetically modified now, including the staples God provided us with. Wheat, corn, grains, etc. You can find it all on the above website. All truth. All researched thoroughly...and proving the Bible to be 100% true and being fulfilled just as it says.
Book of Enoch fallen angel/ hybrid giants root magic lore suggest an attempt to combine their energys with roots and plants..mandrake most famously..but many ie possessed plants ingested compromising our spiritual integrity..also alluded too in witch's brews etc.
Potentcizing these further in isolations,increasing toxicitys and nature's abilities to temper and soften such evils has led to part of the toxic problem with modern drugs...minions aware of this and further effecting it at DNA or nano vibe level further still down the bad hole..many drugs laced with snake venom tied to the Garden situation..so yes much bad of it..but some good of healing Godly herbs..discerning of tampered with by evil part of mission of Christians,etc
It seems yes, you can do it, but it probably depends on the delivery method. Proteins like the one mentioned can cleave and modify gene expression Pills are unlikely but not impossible - intravenous is a yes, other methods seem to be at experimental stages but given they lie about everything who knows?
Timed release pills can likely release lower intestines,etc, nasal definitely,proven nasal delivery, skin by micro needles..which proves patches can to likely as well as creams,gels with solvent ir DMSO...All this DMSO push makes me nervous or how can it not physlitate spread of nano,mRNA, parasites etc yet so little talk of that= scary suspicious..beware of DMSO my new current peeve.
What basis do you have for being suspicious of dmso?
Because dmso admittedly assists as a solvent,likely the most powerful bio solvent allowing protective barriers, membranes,etc to be crossed by not just dmso but all chemicals and items in the vicinity of the DMSO including nano tech or par asites..
Hulda Clark however the queen of anti parasite cures and devices thought DMSO somehow was ok and curative reaching deep into the foul, rancid oils and fats where parasites hide as well as heavy metals and toxic chemicals... isopropyl alcohol and another alcohol I forget she labeled a toxic solvent permitting parasites to get thru..my guess is the rubbing alcohol is destroying the tissue as well and parasites love dead tissue whereas dmso doesn't...still I'm not certain that since parasites couldn't utilize the dmso to slip thru especially the artificial partly at least programmed parasites that tend to utilize proteins from real parasites..why ivermectin can stop both nano and parasites.
Dmso vs nano= largely unknown to my knowledge..and several kinds of nano..don't like that risky mystery..tests must be done as nano is more dangerous then parasites or fast mind control, other..
The author seems to conflate statins with PCSK9 inhibitors.
I'm no fan of statins, in fact I believe them to be a mitochondrial toxin, and have written about it extensively.
But there is no evidence presented here to suggest that statins are gene-therapy.
PCSK9- may be a different story. But, they are not statins.
Iliyans specialized in revealing hi tech in drugs far from what's supposed to be there..I wouldn't bet the farm she's not right..but the evidence isnt concise nor seconded by others..
In a nutshell why do stations end up killing mitochondrial..ties to neuronal deficit then as well since gut bio factors are producing neurons? Is this compounded by more simplistic lack of cholesterol,fats statins targeting for such as brain feeds on cholesterol to function better?
Statins are extremely bad for people but that doesn’t mean that it employs CRISPR technology. If someone gets off statins the suppression of LDL production stops. If it was causing a gene edit (as does CRISPR) the effect would be permanent.
She's claiming one dose of certain types do permanent effect at 2 years ,88 percent reduction ie gene edit effect! Don't skim it
It's a good post about statins but cholesterol isn't related to heart disease in the general population to begin with:
Is atherosclerosis caused by high cholesterol?
U. Ravnskov
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 95, Issue 6, June 2002, Pages 397–403, https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/95.6.397
Published: 01 June 2002 https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/95/6/397/1559536?login=false
Cholesterol does not predict degree of atherosclerosis at autopsy
In 1936, Landé and Sperry noted that the degree of aortic atherosclerosis at autopsy of healthy individuals who had died violently, was independent on their blood cholesterol concentration analysed immediately after death.4 Their finding was confirmed by Mathur et al.5 and similar results were obtained by others.6–8 The objection that an analysis of cholesterol after death may not reflect its concentration during life was met by Mathur et al.5 who found that the cholesterol concentration was almost constant up to 16 h after death. Paterson et al.6 bypassed the problem by comparing the degree of atherosclerosis at death with the individuals’ cholesterol measured previously on several occasions. In all these studies, plots of blood cholesterol concentrations vs. the lipid content of the aorta or the coronary arteries were widely scattered.
More recent autopsy studies have found weak or inconsistent correlations between LDL‐cholesterol or total cholesterol and various measures of atherosclerosis.9 For instance, the most severe degree of atherosclerosis was found mainly in individuals with extremely high cholesterol, whereas small differences were seen in the rest.10 A correlation was found in White men, but not in Black men,11 in men but not in women,12 in individuals below, but not above age 80 years,13 and in the coronary arteries, but not in the thoracic or abdominal aorta.14
The weak and unpredictable correlations probably reflect bias, because most of the studies were performed on selected individuals. In such large projects, the main object of which was to study risk factors for cardiovascular disease, individuals with such diseases, or with high cholesterol, were preferred for post‐mortem examination,10–15 which means that the proportion of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia must have been much larger than in the general population. As such patients have very high cholesterol and are more prone to vascular changes, their inclusion automatically creates a correlation between degree of atherosclerosis and LDL or total cholesterol. Accordingly, it is obvious from a figure in a preliminary report that the correlation disappears if individuals with total cholesterol >350 mg/ml (9 mmol/l) are excluded.16 It is questionable if the vascular changes seen in familial hypercholesterolaemia are synonymous with atherosclerosis.17,18 Therefore, to prove that the concentration of LDL‐cholesterol has importance in the general population, it is necessary to exclude individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Cholesterol does not correlate with degree of coronary atherosclerosis on angiography
A correlation between the pathological findings seen on coronary angiography and cholesterol has been found in many studies.19 However, the correlation coefficients in these studies were never >0.36 and often much smaller; in some studies no correlation was found.20–23 When present, the correlation found may have been due to bias by the process mentioned above, because coronary angiography is mainly performed on patients with symptomatic coronary disease, and more often on middle‐aged and younger patients. The correlation disappeared in one study after exclusion of patients treated with lipid‐lowering drugs.24
Cholesterol does not correlate with degree of coronary calcification
In contrast to conventional angiography, electron beam angiography detects coronary plaques independent of their location in the vessel wall, but only calcified plaques. Degree of coronary calcification seems a good surrogate for degree of coronary atherosclerosis, because it correlates strongly with total plaque volume and obstructive coronary disease, and is a powerful predictor of clinical outcome. Nonetheless, degree of coronary calcification did not correlate with any lipid fraction in the blood.25
Cholesterol does not correlate with degree of peripheral atherosclerosis
Many studies have found an association between LDL‐ or total cholesterol and peripheral atherosclerosis, depicted by angiography or ultrasonography, but only in dichotomous analyses, and again, differences have been found mainly between individuals with very high cholesterol concentrations and the rest. In ultrasonographic studies, where degree of carotic atherosclerosis was graded as a continuous variable, no correlation was found with individual LDL‐cholesterol concentrations.26,27 In similar studies using aortic28 and femoral29 angiography, no correlation was found either. Mean femoral intima‐media thickness was evaluated by ultrasonography in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and in control individuals with normal cholesterol. Using all observations, a correlation was found (r=0.41), but from a visual judgement of the scatterplot, within each group no clear correlation was present.30
Looking at photos of calcified arteries seems clear calcification is occurring first by damaging inner vein sides and penetrating ,causing dryness and brittleness and occasional ruptured..cholesterol also functions as main vein patch kit when this occurs,why plaqued photos reveal a thin white ish color on veins edge,then a layer of yellowish, lite brownish plaque that's obviously primarily cholesterol.
Occasionally you'll find photos of arteries with solid shiny white chalk and no yellow etc at all= pure calcification caused likely by excess calcium and vitamin D supplements as only that combo could force white chalk calcium into veins to shiny,reflective level.
7 years ago over a quarter of photos shown under Google search of calcified arteries showed white calcified chalk effect,virtually no level or less then 5 to 10 percent anyways.
Today you google and virtually no white coated arteries pop up= conspiracy to delete proofs that it's calcification ,not cholesterol as primary instigator and cause as well as heart disease and artery,vein disease and many European researchers claim dementia and Alzheimer's as well(brain is more sensitive to other toxic metals ie aluminum,etc but binding effect of calcium to heavy metals is purposely ignored by elite conspirators who run big pharma).
Without cholesterol repairing vein damages like glue of sharp edges synthetic calcium from China largely,death would be sooner not later avg.
Vitamin D ,choliciferol is active ingredient of many rat poisons that work by hormone signaling yanking of calcium from rats bones at extreme dose into arteries, caking them and organs and rat dies of dehydration by preliminary stages of calcification...if that rat lived a few more weeks or months that caking, dehydration stage would reach brittleness of veins linings and ruptured would occur in heart attack, stroke,clots forming at damage site and dislodging, travelinh to heart or brain or even internally bleeding to death from vein ruptured..
At lower dose takes usually years for this to occur with humans..but inner dehydration ie arteries not flexible and watered enough also plays into all this: best to over hydrate with a pinch of sea salt and lemon juice fresh added (about a half squeezed lemon per liter or 2)..
Vit.D assists health as a lab synthetic by sucking not just calcium but all minerals from bones fast (ie most first 2 hours after taking pills) causing a energy and co factor nutrient rush as well as pulling in sun activated cholesterol sulfate from skin(ie sulfur=pullable by D mineral you see..) but primary effect is from bones mineral pull contrary to what we've been told or how can you pull calcium from bones and not other minerals, duh ,we've been so gullible.. elites realized feeding their little workers cardboard, synthetic foods would not sustain on minerals anyway so they devised a clever solution to rob the bones daily of bioavailable top level minerals in small amounts to keep blood then body healthier with the cost not generally seem got most people until mid 60s with crippling osteoporosis and mass bone breaks ie hip fractures accounting for a quarter of eventual deaths nearly.. perfect! They don't want or need us past 60 now or push for elderly to suicide themselves or allow hospitals to do it..
See how that all comes together fellow rats,oh sorry humans I meant!?
Thanks Greg, your comment with some images would make a great post in and of itself.
Yes indeed.Maybe I'll use way back machine to fetch old white chalky hundred percent calcified arteries used to be widely shown on google..But really likely over half heart surgeons would confess calcification of arteries primary issues not plaque largely cholesterol caused or instigated anyway and current accepted line that calcification percentage is actually helpful to prevent soft plaque break offs ie clotting is a misleading lie largely to detour from calcium buildup as main villain..Only question is how much of a factor is synthetic ,china made largely rough edged calcium flakes embedding like asbestos in vein linings vs calcium in smoother, bio available form from bone releases (caused by vit.D ,other) a percentage factor in modern heart disease).Judging by many factors including radical reductions of calcium supplement milligram averages in multi vitamins,maybe a quarter multis down to zero,mirroring nearly what happened with iron reductions over a decade back,it may one day be realized that synthetic calcium was in competition with Vitamin D ( rat poison,avg rat dead 5 days,with synthetic calcium added formula for extra $2 rats dead in 2.5 days avg )as most killer eventually substances in modern man's regular food diet or even drug category as well! I'm guessing over fifty percent of West's populace mildly to seriously diseased by age fifty by these 2 so called vitamins..would make it a top 10 cause of disease and death,pre reductions of D and calcium levels ie 6 to 20 years back top 5 reducer of population post 50 years of age,pre 50 years still top 15-20...has to be since heart and vein disease is tied approx with cancer as number one killer and white chalky calcium deposits are found in 96 percent of breast cancers with high levels also of toxic metals binding and about a quarter of other tumours across body.Calcium deposits many other diseases measure role,not so third world countrys unfortified or supplemented=rat poison ie Vit.D and synthetic calcium our most effective poison of billions of rats and unfortunately billions of humans too!
I blame my mother’s dementia on her 20 year use of statin meds. As she got older and her memory started to fail, and I had POA for her healthcare, I would ask her PCP about the statins and memory loss. His reply…”oh she’s on a low dose statin”. I finally got him to take her off the statins (after talking to him about them and her memory for over two years). This was 9 months prior to her death. But it was too late, as far as her memory…the damage had been done. And I didn’t allow her to get the C*V*D Jabs either!
Thank you. A wealth of information.
Unfortunately, most people are so conditioned to trust standard medical information, they don’t want to listen to anything contrary, even when it might be in their own interest.
Death and destruction all around, and the depths of the wickedness hard to plumb.
Statin Medications
Continuing Education Activity
about statins, from NIH book library at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430940/
for anyone who wants to learn FACTS, REAL FACTS, and no BS.
I have no trust in the NIH!
How bad is alcohol use in connection with cholesterol/heart disease/liver disease?
This is total bs
Does this apply to Ezetimibe as well, the "non statin, statin"?
Hi Carol! I wonder if you have ever done the research on the supplements and how its nano technology interacts with liver and gull bladder? As I understand most of the waste detoxed by liver system, will the gull bladder stone associated with the nano technology in the supplement? Thanks
I had monocolonal antibodies treatment once in 2021 during the C craziness…is my gene permanently gone??!! 😕🌸